Reader Response Draft # 1
In the article “How Volcanic Ash Strengthens A Roof
Against Powerful Projectiles”, Williams (2019) states that the addition of
volcanic ash layers on the roofs can mitigate the impact of volcanic projectiles
on shelters around active volcanoes.
Williams claims that scientists had discovered mountain
huts were capable of providing life-saving shelter for hikers during the
eruption that took place at Mount Ontake, Japan 2014. This finding inspired the
scientists to further study on how the addition of volcanic ash on roofs could
reduce impacts of projectiles. Through meticulous simulation, scientists were
able to deduce that the thickness of ash deposit is proportional to the roofs’
energy absorption rate from projectiles. Five centimeters of ash layer tripled
the strength of the roof from projectiles. However, heavier loads of ash may
affect the structural integrity of the roof.
Additionally, he states that scientists expected
buildings to take more damage from multiple volcanic hazards as compared to
one. Tests proved otherwise, on condition that tephra is placed on roofs before
impacts. Williams concludes that researchers will conduct further investigation
to determine the optimum range of ash deposit layers to achieve a balance
between reducing impact of projectiles and risk of roof collapsing.
The consequences of utilizing volcanic ash can bring harm
to the residents. Although the article claims that utilizing volcanic ash can
benefit cities near volcanoes, the disadvantages of using volcanic ash outweigh
the benefits.
Firstly, volcanic ash is produce when volcanic eruption
happens. Volcanic ash consists of particles that has low density and can travel
long distances, carried by winds. The ash in the sky will eventually falls to
the ground; this phenomenon is known as ash fall and it leaves a thick layer of
ash on roofs. When existing tephra cushioned structures are subjected to
additional volcanic ash from ash fall phenomenon, it is possible that the
thickness of ash deposit will increase. According to the website (United States
Geological Survey, 2015), ash fall can potentially cause collapse of buildings if
the thickness exceeds 100mm. The likelihood of a roof collapse is higher if the
ash accumulated is wetted. This is supported by a documented incident that took
place in Philippines which claimed 300 lives. This incident was caused by the
“collapse of roofs from the ash load on roofs during the explosive eruption of
Mt. Pinatubo on June 15, 1991” (United States Geological Survey, 2015).
Secondly, Williams (2019) states that researchers needed
to observe and study the effect of tephra cushioning but are unable to do so
because of the extreme danger associated with close observation of impacts
around volcanoes. To prove that tephra cushioning is effective against impacts
from volcanic projectiles, researchers use a real-life simulation to project
volcanic rock on reinforced concrete (RC) with and without tephra cushioning. The
experiment may not be accurate as there are factors that can affect the
accuracy of the experiment. One of the factor is the life-span of the materials
in a structure, longer life-span has weaker strength to withstand impacts compare
to a new structure. This factor can result in the experiment to over or
underestimate the amount of energy tephra can withstand. According to the
article “Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research”, Williams (2019)
claims that the RC used during experiment was less than a year old. Williams
also claims that the tiles were bought from a junkyard and the age of the materials
were unknown. On the other hand, the size of the rocks used in the experiment
is limited as the simulator has constraints. In actual volcanic eruption,
volcanic projectiles have a wide range of sizes. Therefore in my opinion, the
accuracy of the result of tephra withstanding impacts from volcanic projectiles
does not truly reflect the reality consequences.
Lastly, long or short term exposure to volcanic ash is
detrimental to the health of the residents. According to the article “Volcanic
Ash: More Than Just A Science Project”, Williams (2016) states that short term
exposure to volcanic ash can cause individuals to have respiratory problems,
eye problems and skin irritation. Williams also claims that volcanic ash can
cause silicosis, which can be fatal even with treatment; and affect the quality
of water by contaminating it.
References
George Williams,
B. M. (2019, 11). Tephra cushioning of ballistic impacts: Quantifying
building vulnerabiltiy through pneumatic cannon experiments and multiple
fragility curve fitting approaches. Retrieved from Research Gate:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337083288_Tephra_cushioning_of_ballistic_impacts_Quantifying_building_vulnerability_through_pneumatic_cannon_experiments_and_multiple_fragility_curve_fitting_approaches
Survey, U. S.
(2015, 12 09). Volcanic Ash Impacts & Mitigation. Retrieved from
Volcanic Ashfall Impacts:
https://volcanoes.usgs.gov/volcanic_ash/roof_loading.html
Williams, G.
(2016, November 14). Volcanic Ash: More Than Just A Science Project.
Retrieved from Geology and Human Health: https://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/health/case_studies/volcanic_ash.html
Comments
Post a Comment